There has been a lot of interest lately in Medication Synchronization programs as a way to improve a pharmacy’s EQuIPP measures, especially as they related to measures of Proportion of Days Covered (PDC). While there are a number of possible ways to implement Med Sync, it is important to not lose site of the actual goals of therapy.
For years, mail order pharmacy has touted cost savings based on the supposition of improved patient compliance. As it turns out, these assumptions were often flawed due to the disconnect between the billing / shipping of the product and the patient actually taking the medicament. Indeed, automated refills of any nature, including mail order or Med Sync programs, will show improved compliance (based on claims data including the day supply and dates of refill), magically augmenting a pharmacy’s performance with respect to PDC.
While many pharmacies would be thrilled to improve their PDC related measures, making an investment in Med Sync appealing, the real story is both more interesting and harder to document.
The more important measure, and one that is not adequately measured by EQuIPP or other PDC style metrics, is the rate the patient takes their medication correctly. There is a subtle, yet important difference between these. The PDC is based only on claims data, which comes from the information written on the prescription. The latter is a combination of the instructions given to the patient by the prescriber directly (which are often at odds with those written) and the patient’s willingness or ability to follow thru with these directions.
Many Pharmacy Management Systems will flag early or late refills for the pharmacist or technician to follow-up with, but in reality these are difficult to leverage. For example, If a patient with 100% compliance to the prescription’s directions, picks up meds four our or five days early over the course of a few months (simply out of convenience), they could easily be 2 or more weeks late on the current refill without actually being out of medication. A calculation looking at 3 to 6 months of the dispensing record gives a more accurate picture of the patient’s compliance and persistence in taking their medication.
One of the tools we use daily in our pharmacy is Continuous Medication Monitoring (CMM). Each time we refill any medication for a patient, we carefully look at the entire patient profile. For each prescription in the patient’s profile, a persistence score is calculated over time using the total number of days dispensed (corrected for future days) versus the actual days passed. While this can be done manually, our software automatically flags any prescriptions showing any drop.
When we notice an unexplained drop in persistence for any medication, we can approach the patient to inquire if anything has changed. Quite often, any changes in persistence are explained not by the patient’s inability to follow the regimen prescribed, but by new instructions given to them by the prescriber that have not been communicated to the pharmacy.
Thru the use of CMM, these types of issues can be addressed with the patient at the counter. From there, the prescriber can be approached to provide a new prescription with updated instructions. In the end, compliance was not the problem, but communication between practitioners.
As you consider implementation of a Med Sync program, be sure to keep in mind that compliance and persistence are more than just claims data. Be alert for evidence of changes, and “Make Every Encounter Count” when you have the patient in front of you.
